Skip to content

docs: fix 'reponses' typo in SharePoint tutorial - #3056

Open
chenlichao wants to merge 1 commit into
openai:mainfrom
chenlichao:fix/reponses-typo-sharepoint-tutorial
Open

docs: fix 'reponses' typo in SharePoint tutorial#3056
chenlichao wants to merge 1 commit into
openai:mainfrom
chenlichao:fix/reponses-typo-sharepoint-tutorial

Conversation

@chenlichao

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Summary

  • Fix a one-word spelling typo in the SharePoint tutorial: reponsesresponses, in the code comment explaining how the Microsoft Graph API ranks search results (examples/chatgpt/sharepoint_azure_function/Using_Azure_Functions_and_Microsoft_Graph_to_Query_SharePoint.md, line 769).

Motivation

The tutorial is a frequently referenced walkthrough for querying SharePoint with Microsoft Graph and Azure Functions, and the typo sits in the prose explaining the ranking logic. Spelling and grammar review is part of the cookbook's own contribution rubric, and this is the last remaining reponses misspelling in the repo. Documentation-only change — no code or notebook behavior is affected.

Verification

  • Confirmed exactly one line changed (git diff --stat: 1 file, +1/-1)
  • git diff --check passes (no whitespace errors)
  • Searched the working tree for reponses: 0 remaining occurrences
  • Checked open PRs touching this file (docs: consolidate typo and link fixes across cookbook #2787 fixes a different typo, and and, at line 161 in the same file — this one is not covered there)

@chenlichao
chenlichao requested a review from a team as a code owner September 3, 2026 17:12
@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Sep 3, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Codex Review Summary

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review Completed 2026-09-03T17:14:50.646251Z 384efbb PR opened
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant